Files
build/patch/kernel/archive/sunxi-5.18/patches.megous/rtw89-convert-rtw89_band-to-nl80211_band-precisely.patch
The-going 176c05d4b0 Sunxi 5.18 (#3908)
* sunxi-5.18: add new megous patches

* switch to v5.18.5: exclude a previously applied patch

* fix: tools/mk_format_patch: numbered=false by default

* sunxi-5.18: rebasing and extraction using the mk_format_patch script
2022-06-20 15:31:38 +02:00

142 lines
5.1 KiB
Diff

From 43654c25711966ec173bc59b2f5bb7113402efe3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 08:52:14 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 504/534] rtw89: convert rtw89_band to nl80211_band precisely
Before 6 GHz band was supported, i.e. only 2 GHz and 5 GHz, they were the
same from the numerical point of view. However, after 6 GHz band support,
we need to do this conversion logically.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220516005215.5878-6-pkshih@realtek.com
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c | 11 +++++++----
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 13 +++++++------
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
index 440413e00..c23ecf467 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.c
@@ -1608,10 +1608,13 @@ static void rtw89_core_update_rx_status(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
if (rtwdev->scanning &&
RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD, &rtwdev->fw)) {
- rx_status->freq =
- ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(hal->current_channel,
- hal->current_band_type);
- rx_status->band = rtwdev->hal.current_band_type;
+ u8 chan = hal->current_channel;
+ u8 band = hal->current_band_type;
+ enum nl80211_band nl_band;
+
+ nl_band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(band);
+ rx_status->freq = ieee80211_channel_to_frequency(chan, nl_band);
+ rx_status->band = nl_band;
}
if (desc_info->icv_err || desc_info->crc32_err)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 7eb1b5494..46e806650 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -3481,6 +3481,20 @@ static inline u8 rtw89_hw_to_rate_info_bw(enum rtw89_bandwidth hw_bw)
return RATE_INFO_BW_20;
}
+static inline
+enum nl80211_band rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(enum rtw89_band hw_band)
+{
+ switch (hw_band) {
+ default:
+ case RTW89_BAND_2G:
+ return NL80211_BAND_2GHZ;
+ case RTW89_BAND_5G:
+ return NL80211_BAND_5GHZ;
+ case RTW89_BAND_6G:
+ return NL80211_BAND_6GHZ;
+ }
+}
+
static inline
enum rtw89_bandwidth nl_to_rtw89_bandwidth(enum nl80211_chan_width width)
{
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index f693b2eaf..168d853e2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -2072,7 +2072,7 @@ static void rtw89_release_pkt_list(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
struct rtw89_pktofld_info *info, *tmp;
u8 idx;
- for (idx = RTW89_BAND_2G; idx < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; idx++) {
+ for (idx = NL80211_BAND_2GHZ; idx < NUM_NL80211_BANDS; idx++) {
if (!(rtwdev->chip->support_bands & BIT(idx)))
continue;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
index 0aa0ced45..e219bed38 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
@@ -429,27 +429,28 @@ void rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS16,
RTW89_HW_RATE_MCS24};
u8 band = rtwdev->hal.current_band_type;
+ enum nl80211_band nl_band = rtw89_hw_to_nl80211_band(band);
u8 tx_nss = rtwdev->hal.tx_nss;
u8 i;
for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++)
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_he[i],
RA_MASK_HE_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_HE,
- mask->control[band].he_mcs[i],
+ mask->control[nl_band].he_mcs[i],
0, true))
goto out;
for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++)
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_vht[i],
RA_MASK_VHT_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_VHT,
- mask->control[band].vht_mcs[i],
+ mask->control[nl_band].vht_mcs[i],
0, true))
goto out;
for (i = 0; i < tx_nss; i++)
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, hw_rate_ht[i],
RA_MASK_HT_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_HT,
- mask->control[band].ht_mcs[i],
+ mask->control[nl_band].ht_mcs[i],
0, true))
goto out;
@@ -457,18 +458,18 @@ void rtw89_phy_rate_pattern_vif(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
* require at least one basic rate for ieee80211_set_bitrate_mask,
* so the decision just depends on if all bitrates are set or not.
*/
- sband = rtwdev->hw->wiphy->bands[band];
+ sband = rtwdev->hw->wiphy->bands[nl_band];
if (band == RTW89_BAND_2G) {
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, RTW89_HW_RATE_CCK1,
RA_MASK_CCK_RATES | RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES,
RTW89_RA_MODE_CCK | RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM,
- mask->control[band].legacy,
+ mask->control[nl_band].legacy,
BIT(sband->n_bitrates) - 1, false))
goto out;
} else {
if (!__check_rate_pattern(&next_pattern, RTW89_HW_RATE_OFDM6,
RA_MASK_OFDM_RATES, RTW89_RA_MODE_OFDM,
- mask->control[band].legacy,
+ mask->control[nl_band].legacy,
BIT(sband->n_bitrates) - 1, false))
goto out;
}
--
2.35.3